![]() ![]() The concurrent validity coefficients for individual disorders or clusters ranged from. ![]() Kappas for presence/absence of any personality disorder ranged from. Agreement between the two instruments was poor to moderate regardless of the criterion set for a diagnosis of personality disorder on the MCMI. 67), with the highest reliability obtained for avoidant personality disorder (κ =. 75 for individual personality disorder categories, reliability coefficients ranged from. ![]() The interrater reliability coefficients for the SCID-II with a sample of anxious outpatients were promising: The kappa coefficient for presence or absence of any personality disorder with the SCID-II was. Diagnoses of agoraphobic outpatients yielded by a standardized interview (SCID-II) and by a self- report questionnaire (Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory, MCMI-II) were compared. The purpose of this study was to examine the concurrent validity of personality disorder diagnoses and the interrater reliability of a relatively new instrument for assessment of personality disorders, the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R, Axis II (SCID-II). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |